Chose One

Running head : ON THE CASE OF KEVIN TAYLOROn the Case of Kevin TaylorMACROBUTTON NoMacro [Insert plant calling of Author (s ) here]MACROBUTTON NoMacro [Insert Institution information here] Given the facts twisty in the case , the court-ordered principles that would more or less probable be involved include the exclusionary encounter as thoroughly as the sound principle of fair(a) question in the context of hunt club and seizure of examine . The exclusionary rule is a principle founded on the uprightness stating that recites which are self-collected or scrutinized that violates the Constitution of the unify States , specifically the rights of the individual , dropnot be admitted for a criminal pursuance in a legal court (Kratochwil , 1991 ,. 62 . chthonian the case of Michigan v Long , a law enforcer has the option to contribute issue a hold in protective bearing of a vehicle if the law enforcer has a reasonable suspicion that an individual suspect is two armed and terrible (Puchalsky 2007 ,. 706In essence , the motion to stifle the evidence would primarily be grounded on the principle of the exclusionary rule where the avouchment from the defense testament most likely claim that the evidence has been illegally obtained . This is be travail in that respect is no search warrant to the prop and some other(a) belongings of the suspect prior to the instruction execution of the search and seizure . Hence , the court should not encounter the seized firearms and ammunition taken from the apartment of Kevin Taylor and should , more importantly , suppress these things from macrocosm considered as evidenceThe primary point of conflict that arises out this slip concerns the issue of whether or not the seized firearms and ammunition be considered as evidences against Kevin Taylor . At one hand it can be argued , peculiarly ! from the suspect s side , that the firearms and ammunition were illegally seized since there is no existing warrant prior to the seizure .

On the other hand , there is the assertion of reasonable suspicion whereby the in truth suspicious nature of the situation curiously the very charge of firearms and ammunition in the apartment of the defendant is a comforting reason to seize these potential sources of threat and harm to individualsApparently , it can be contended however that having firearms and ammunitions within a given put in does not necessarily incriminate that the individual owning the objects will most certainly use this weapons to rush harm to other mess . Quite on the oth er hand , there too remains the reason to moot that the defendant is up to no good and will , at some point in time , resort to exploitation the availability of the weapons to unlawfully cause harmful situations for the fact that the defendant has previous cases which involves being convicted of a misdemeanor involving domestic rage and was in illegal self-possession of the firearms as a forbidden person under form of address 18 , joined States Code , Section 922 (g (9What caused the reason to believe that the clearing of the areas female genital organ the doors is for the best interest for the protection of the...If you emergency to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay